Navigating Government Regulation with Experienced Counsel
Government regulations shape nearly every aspect of how businesses operate — from licensing and permitting to environmental compliance, financial services regulation, and administrative enforcement. When a government agency initiates an enforcement action, denies a permit, or targets your business for investigation, the outcome can affect your ability to operate, your reputation, and your financial stability.
SilverCain provides strategic counsel and effective advocacy to businesses, organizations, and individuals navigating regulatory and administrative challenges. Leon Silver served as national Practice Group Chair for Governmental, Regulatory & Administrative Law at one of the largest law firms in the United States, bringing exceptional depth to this practice area.
Regulatory & Administrative Matters We Handle
When Government Becomes Adversarial
When an agency targets your business, the procedural rules, timelines, and standards of review in administrative proceedings are significantly different from court litigation. Experience in this specific environment matters. SilverCain has handled high-profile government-related litigation throughout its attorneys’ careers and provides the sophisticated representation these matters demand.
Contact SilverCain
Phone: +1-602-726-1244| Email: info@silvercain.com | 3101 N. Central Avenue, Suite 1410, Phoenix, AZ 85012
An administrative hearing is a formal proceeding before a government agency or an administrative law judge (ALJ) to resolve a regulatory dispute — such as a license revocation, a permit denial, or an enforcement action. Administrative hearings follow different procedural rules than court proceedings, often have more limited discovery, and apply different standards of proof. Appeals from administrative decisions go to court but are reviewed under a deferential standard that makes overturning agency decisions difficult. Experienced administrative counsel is important from the earliest stages.
Do not ignore it, and do not respond without experienced legal counsel. A government investigation notice — whether from a state agency, a federal regulator, or a law enforcement agency — triggers immediate obligations and strategic decisions. Document preservation is critical. Communications with the agency should be carefully managed. The scope of the investigation and the agency's authority need to be assessed. Early and experienced legal involvement significantly improves outcomes in regulatory investigations.
Yes. We advise clients on matters before Arizona's regulatory agencies, including the Arizona Corporation Commission, Arizona Department of Financial Institutions, Arizona Department of Insurance, Arizona Department of Health Services, and other state bodies. We are also experienced in federal regulatory matters and coordinate with specialized regulatory counsel when the matter requires federal agency expertise.
Yes. When government agencies propose new rules or regulations, they typically conduct public comment proceedings that allow businesses and other stakeholders to submit written comments, present testimony, and advocate for regulatory outcomes that affect their industries. Effective regulatory advocacy — presenting well-reasoned, well-supported positions during the rulemaking process — can shape final rules in meaningful ways. SilverCain has experience representing clients in these proceedings.
Many commercial disputes involve regulatory dimensions — an enforcement action may give rise to private claims, a licensing dispute may affect contractual relationships, or a government investigation may create collateral litigation risk. SilverCain's experience in both commercial litigation and regulatory law allows us to address these intersecting issues in a coordinated way rather than treating them as entirely separate matters.
